> Insurance is designed to protect you from rare but catastrophic losses
That is 100% correct. My point was that the US system of health "insurance" is anything but insurance.
> ... that people have been using it as a way to only pay 20% or less of expenses ...
That isn't the case. Ultimately the premiums paid by you and/or your employer as part of your "benefits" (foregone salary) will cover most of your expenses, otherwise it isn't a viable business model as pretty much everything involves an insurance transaction. The actual procedures really don't cost that much. It is the extra layers of obfuscation, administration, multiple parties etc that totally confuse what is going on.
You should try buying your own insurance someday. It becomes obvious again how it really isn't insurance. I believe California health insurance now requires maternity coverage.
That is 100% correct. My point was that the US system of health "insurance" is anything but insurance.
> ... that people have been using it as a way to only pay 20% or less of expenses ...
That isn't the case. Ultimately the premiums paid by you and/or your employer as part of your "benefits" (foregone salary) will cover most of your expenses, otherwise it isn't a viable business model as pretty much everything involves an insurance transaction. The actual procedures really don't cost that much. It is the extra layers of obfuscation, administration, multiple parties etc that totally confuse what is going on.
You should try buying your own insurance someday. It becomes obvious again how it really isn't insurance. I believe California health insurance now requires maternity coverage.