Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I imagine it may be hard and they don't have incentives to "fix it", but I think the single most important disadvantage of airpods is the battery life... no matter how long it lasts, there's no way to replace it, so they became essentially discardable items. [1]?

1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_obsolescence



This has nothing to do with some evil planned obsolescence, it’s just that you can’t make a device that small while retaining (easy) battery replacement capability.

https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/blog/your-wireless-earbud...


Well they had a choice to make it less small and repairable. But ultimately, they chose small and disposable.

It may not be planned obsolescence, but it's still a choice made with a certain level of disregard for consumers.


> [...] but it's still a choice made with a certain level of disregard for consumers.

Yes, OR, they did regard their customers' preference for smaller headphones.



They have a 10-steps guide of "moderate" difficulty to replace the battery, and it may damage the water resistance of the buds. That’s definitely not what I’d call "easy" battery replacement.

https://www.ifixit.com/Guide/Samsung+Galaxy+Buds+Live+Batter...


Those are huge, though. There's a trade-off.


I'd argue there's a difference between planned obsolescence and products that are of such a nature that it's just about impossible to pull them apart. (Now, whether that means the latter category of products is defensible is a different question)


Everyone in here is showing admiration for apple engineering ability so as i said, probably a difficult problem, but not impossible.

I found this product [1] that's probably not as high quality as airpods but looks like a nice proof of concept actually :-)

1: https://pqearbuds.com/




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: