So, have you refuted the argument in anyway or just downplayed it?
I would have preferred that text in the comment you responded to had less of a trash talking feel to it.
Also it’s a bit overplayed because although these are special moments, there’s no shortage of examples in history where a new approach in one field is applied to get results previously unattainable in another.
However there’s no need for rationalizations. The result doesn’t generalize to anyone is smarter than anyone else, or that it’s not important because it’s not the super most important drug discovery tool.
It’s just a special moment where a technique is impacting another area of research. Which is part of a special period in history where AI/ML is evolving from being literally a joke that could defund your research, to finally having a broad set of useful applications.
We should be glad to see as many of these moments as possible from any discipline to any other.
I would have preferred that text in the comment you responded to had less of a trash talking feel to it.
Also it’s a bit overplayed because although these are special moments, there’s no shortage of examples in history where a new approach in one field is applied to get results previously unattainable in another.
However there’s no need for rationalizations. The result doesn’t generalize to anyone is smarter than anyone else, or that it’s not important because it’s not the super most important drug discovery tool.
It’s just a special moment where a technique is impacting another area of research. Which is part of a special period in history where AI/ML is evolving from being literally a joke that could defund your research, to finally having a broad set of useful applications.
We should be glad to see as many of these moments as possible from any discipline to any other.