Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Thanks I'll take a look. Honest question, if you're not backing up more than 50GB of data, why not just use Backblaze B2 w/ another front-end GUI like ARQ or Cloudberry or Hashbackup? You'd be paying $0.25/month for the storage, much less than with our Computer Backup service, and you can make life-cycle rules that would keep versions for as long as you'd like.


Because I want one service that has everything built in. Like CrashPlan backup app, or your computer backup app. I have mentioned this in my comment.

I understand the price difference but I want the ease, peace etc, not something where I need to hook two or few things together.


I would rather see them leverage/contribute to existing cross-platform client-side backup software like ZManda[0] making the improvements needed to either make it work directly with B2 or integrate with Amanda.

Keep your focus on the storage angle, there are ways to accomplish this, I use a "glue box" (Synology NAS) to collect the data and fire it off to B2, could easily be a linux machine running b2 cli tools[1].

[0]: https://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/Zmanda_Windows_Client

[1]: https://www.backblaze.com/b2/docs/quick_command_line.html


I run a personal home server that acts as my cloud / NAS. I personally think RAID is overkill for most home users. Instead, I use my 2nd drive to mirror the data. This saves me from fat finger errors and such. I also use BTRFS so I can take snapshots and provide my own file versioning.

For offsite backup, I use a time4vps storage server, but I might transition to B2 in the future. I like what I'm hearing.


Understood! Thank you for the additional color!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: