Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm the main author of SC.

Your system does sound similar to SC - It seems to be a pretty standard realtime architecture - Those who started building their realtime systems with Socket.io (as you did) often end up with something similar to what you describe except it takes a lot of work to get there...

A lot of people who use SC decided to make the switch because they started implementing their own pub/sub stack (as you did) and then decided that it would be easier to just use something open source instead of writing their own.

There is a lot more to a realtime stack than just the bidirectional transport.

If you already have a fully working system and you don't need any new features, then you don't necessarily need to migrate to the shiny new tool ;p



I'm curious because I have a relatively new socket.io based application (we went into production in the last month). How difficult is the migration path? (If it's something i can do in an afternoon, I'd be willing to try it out)


Does SC require the need for a DB?


No but there is an optional CRUD module for RethinkDB https://github.com/socketcluster/sc-crud-rethink


Thanks for the answer! I was suspecting as much for our use case but wanted to clarify.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: